From: cman@IO.COM (Douglas Barnes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1edbc9fcef83d7bf04546fea0ed26783dbedc0ab383f4dd7ce8106dc74144952
Message ID: <9311150940.AA12988@illuminati.IO.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-15 09:44:00 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Nov 93 01:44:00 PST
From: cman@IO.COM (Douglas Barnes)
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 93 01:44:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: S.Boxx v. L.Detweiler
Message-ID: <9311150940.AA12988@illuminati.IO.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'd like to mention for the record that I don't give a pair of
dingo's kidneys whether S.Boxx and L.Detweiler are the same person.
Whether they are, or not, it makes no difference. I'm sure in the
twisty little passages (all different) that are LD's brain, he
could easily have some justification for posting as S.Boxx. Or
not.
What's important to me is that I have associated with both a
remarkably similar reputation, such that both entities have
a substantially larger than ordinary burden to overcome to convince
me of anything; if either said it was raining, I would pack an
umbrella *and* sunscreen.
This is how a sane person deals with the current sorry state of
authentication on the net, possibly accompanied by actual work
participating in research and coding to remedy this sorry state.
--
---------------- /\
Douglas Barnes cman@illuminati.io.com / \
Chief Wizard (512) 448-8950 (d), 447-7866 (v) / () \
Illuminati Online metaverse.io.com 7777 /______\
Return to November 1993
Return to “cman@IO.COM (Douglas Barnes)”
1993-11-15 (Mon, 15 Nov 93 01:44:00 PST) - S.Boxx v. L.Detweiler - cman@IO.COM (Douglas Barnes)