1993-11-14 - Re: Fractal cryptography

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: “mycal” <mike@netacsys.com>
Message Hash: 3d0245d2d3f01a6eceb7d4dcd20475c3c18bd38dc3c6d2a8b34785a30120fe9a
Message ID: <9311142057.AA07089@snark.lehman.com>
Reply To: <2ce44fb5.acsys@NetAcsys.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-14 21:00:11 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 13:00:11 PST

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 93 13:00:11 PST
To: "mycal" <mike@netacsys.com>
Subject: Re: Fractal cryptography
In-Reply-To: <2ce44fb5.acsys@NetAcsys.com>
Message-ID: <9311142057.AA07089@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



"mycal" says:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 1993 19:31:09 -0500, "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com> 
wrote:
> > 
> > Amateurs regularly develop systems and claim fantastic things for
> > them. They then turn out to be trivial to break. This has made people
> 
> Just to add a data point, chaos seems to be worth a look.  MIT's
> Research Lab have created new signal-processors designs based on chaos
> theroy for use in secure communication.

I've heard of them. They aren't secure. Just another example of the
same phenomenon.

Perry





Thread