From: Sameer <sameer@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 10:14:21 PST
Subject: Re: Identities vs. Accounts
In-Reply-To: <9311171536.AA04661@anon.penet.fi>
Message-ID: <m0ozrL4-000J5iC@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> 
> 
> Fellow cpunks,
> 	The schemes proposed by Detweiler et al. can only verify that
> get all of my accounts cancelled.  What if I don't use the thing much
[. . .]
> and don't even realize that it's been stolen for two weeks?
> 
> THE POINT:

	That's what digital signatures are for.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLOppHHi7eNFdXppdAQH0cgP+OuRwfoJVGvWa10UNxeTR8Fj3HOh+58oK
p4kEmKb8IS7WC2zxQxaZDApjBDPX1PzgIC3elOSoA4EqAD7Un0Jy8tRbhFRNFLmV
6DK6R0BB98ki9rMsz78R2iYYJxkzE0RMfprfUku1GdxcnYXr+tMTqH51vLU7pU9M
ZG3nZknJWeA=
=5fP0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----