From: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 93 20:03:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Private and Public
In-Reply-To: <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Message-ID: <199311100400.UAA06914@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


--- Forwarded mail from pmetzger@lehman.com

>From owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Tue Nov  9 09:15:40 1993
Return-Path: <owner-cypherpunks@toad.com>
Received: from relay2.UU.NET by mail.netcom.com (8.6.4/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
	id JAA12727; Tue, 9 Nov 1993 09:15:36 -0800
Received: from toad.com by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA04858; Tue, 9 Nov 93 12:13:54 -0500
Received: by toad.com id AA17446; Tue, 9 Nov 93 09:03:39 PST
Received: by toad.com id AA17443; Tue, 9 Nov 93 09:03:11 PST
Received: from lehman.com ([192.147.66.1]) by toad.com id AA17438; Tue, 9 Nov 93 09:03:06 PST
"Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com> said:
>Since Mr. Merritt has insisted, I will take a foray into this issue. I
>would suggest, however, that this is not the forum for this discussion.

Ok...I'll desist after a brief comment: I actually don't disagree with
any of the major points you make when you put it that way -- although
some of the other things I call minor points you might call major points :-)

I think I do have some quibbles which would probably turn *into* serious
disagreement, but even I would say that raising those things would take us
far afield, so I'll leave it at that.

P.S. This is ad hominem...tsk, tsk:

>Mr. Merritt, this discussion is much like that of a Catholic peasant
>in 1500 trying to understand an atheist, with me in the role of the
>atheist.
	Doug