From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Message Hash: 81e2162804b9a4a390629c106224b52590b42ff06423a09d965bcb0c4b312bdc
Message ID: <199311111115.AA03340@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-11 11:19:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 03:19:28 PST
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 03:19:28 PST
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Subject: Re: Should we oppose the
Message-ID: <199311111115.AA03340@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
D >The problem is that bandwidth is a highly limited resource, just like
D >real estate is a limited resource. Eventually we will complete
D >saturate network bandwidth no matter what technology is used. This has
D >been discussed in various forums for many years.
Then why have telecoms prices been declining for years? A three minute
phone call from the US to England cost $25 in 1955 (in 1955 dollars).
Where in the current comms spectrum do you see saturation and rising
prices?
It seems to me that in most resources we get predictions of shortages for
centuries but those shortages never appear because the market eliminates
or dodges them.
DCF
--- WinQwk 2.0b#1165
Return to November 1993
Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”