From: Arthur Chandler <arthurc@crl.com>
To: Sameer <sameer@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 9b8cd8532de1fa7fc49d43684c9a774bbe24b1793fa412e31378cf22a90fe2db
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9311111946.A17194-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <m0oxoNK-000J5iC@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-12 03:19:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 19:19:18 PST
From: Arthur Chandler <arthurc@crl.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 19:19:18 PST
To: Sameer <sameer@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: (fwd) Netcom adds access in Denver area
In-Reply-To: <m0oxoNK-000J5iC@infinity.hip.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9311111946.A17194-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
As someone who has gotten some pretty crusty mail for posting
issues related to the social and cultural aspects of encryption -- "stay
on the subject! this place is about encryption, not politics!" -- may I
ask -- very politely, of course -- what these plugs for netcom are
doing here? I'm using a different provider, and am very happy with them.
But should I be plugging them (or dinging them) on this list?
Return to November 1993
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”