cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1993-11-11 - Re: Should we oppose the Data Superhighway/NII?

Header Data

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Message Hash: a9a3ef8a4b730d9d77c28200a75669c2c5d5792f72958f0577411e6f1ebe56ef
Message ID: <199311111535.AA02116@eff.org>
Reply To: <9311110120.AA08393@smds.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-11 15:39:11 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 07:39:11 PST

Raw message

From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 93 07:39:11 PST
To: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Subject: Re: Should we oppose the Data Superhighway/NII?
In-Reply-To: <9311110120.AA08393@smds.com>
Message-ID: <199311111535.AA02116@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


 
Steve Witham writes:

> As I understand it, for both telephones and cable TV, it is still common
> for local governments to "grant" "franchises" to single companies for
> phone and cable wires.  If there were one thing to change, that would be
> it.
> 
> In other words, the "market failure" you're talking about is in a 
> situation where the law forbids a market.  And the change required is 
> that the government not be involved.  It would be nice if that were
> how EFF stated its NII policy: Yankee Go Home.

It's not that simple, unfortunately. Once monopolies have been created
with government support, removing government intervention doesn't 
automatically make competition happen.

Compare it to strip-mining: once a strip mine has dug up the landscape,
the mere decision to stop mining doesn't automatically restore the land to
the status quo ante, or even to an environment in which any kind of
ecosystem can flourish.


--Mike

Thread