From: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d5cd4a2c89690850570da4739636ce9044eaa729c642f929637fb6db0c5f3d72
Message ID: <199311090503.VAA01852@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-09 05:03:07 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 21:03:07 PST
From: doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 21:03:07 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Mark Abene (Phiber Optik) sentenced
Message-ID: <199311090503.VAA01852@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
>Dunno if this is how they did it, but you get *perfect* data tapping
>if you record digitally off the exchange trunks...
"Perfect" reproduction of an analog signal that may be noisy and smeared,
you mean. The original critique holds. Your argument applies if and only
if the entire transmission is digital from one end to the other.
Doug
Return to November 1993
Return to “doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)”
1993-11-09 (Mon, 8 Nov 93 21:03:07 PST) - Re: Mark Abene (Phiber Optik) sentenced - doug@netcom.com (Doug Merritt)