From: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal Finney)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ee52d2011d11b674e43427210a7b84db3823b51e8c5197f3b115ee69da427e64
Message ID: <9311290418.AA28129@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-29 04:19:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Nov 93 20:19:40 PST
From: hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal Finney)
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 93 20:19:40 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers: Turnaround Times?
Message-ID: <9311290418.AA28129@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Coerr asks about turnaround times for the remailers. Karl Barrus posts
a list of remailers approximately every month. On that list he shows
which remailers have high-speed, continuous connections to the internet
and which have intermittent connections which introduce larger than normal
delays. In my experience, the direct-connected remailers generally respond
within a minute or two. The other ones introduce delays ranging from an
hour or so up to overnight. A good test is to send a "ping" (remail to self)
message to each remailer and see how quickly responses arrive. In my
experience, the extropia remailer tends to take a few hours, while the rebma
remailer is usually a day or sometimes longer. I don't have recent values
for the others.
Hal Finney
hfinney@shell.portal.com
Return to November 1993
Return to “hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal Finney)”
1993-11-29 (Sun, 28 Nov 93 20:19:40 PST) - Re: Remailers: Turnaround Times? - hfinney@shell.portal.com (Hal Finney)