1993-12-24 - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination

Header Data

From: Jim choate <ravage@wixer.bga.com>
To: jschultz@bigcat.missouri.edu (John Schultz)
Message Hash: 0d83fb8ae6707d4fb7678b256bfdac5032ddbcb94dd9bb6c2f9be608d39b2526
Message ID: <9312241715.AA00700@wixer>
Reply To: <Pine.3.07.9312241113.A17809-a100000@bigcat>
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-24 17:36:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Dec 93 09:36:22 PST

Raw message

From: Jim choate <ravage@wixer.bga.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 93 09:36:22 PST
To: jschultz@bigcat.missouri.edu (John Schultz)
Subject: Re: Encryption & self-incrimination
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.07.9312241113.A17809-a100000@bigcat>
Message-ID: <9312241715.AA00700@wixer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Greetz...

I have heard of similar cases but usually related to newspaper reporters and
sources they refused to reveal. Course, it does make a certain amount of
sense in these cases since you have a constitutional guarantee to face your
accussers.

Thread

• Return to December 1993

• Return to “Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>”
• Return to “Jim choate <ravage@wixer.bga.com>”
• Return to “John Schultz <jschultz@bigcat.missouri.edu>”
• Return to “Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>”

• Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”

• 1993-12-24 (Thu, 23 Dec 93 22:16:13 PST) - Encryption & self-incrimination - Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
  • 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 08:26:21 PST) - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination - Jim choate <ravage@wixer.bga.com>
    • 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 09:16:21 PST) - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination - John Schultz <jschultz@bigcat.missouri.edu>
      • 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 09:36:22 PST) - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination - Jim choate <ravage@wixer.bga.com>
      • 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 11:01:22 PST) - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
    • 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 10:16:35 PST) - Re: Encryption & self-incrimination - Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>