1993-12-08 - Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: DPSWG Crypto-Policy Statement to White House (fwd)

Header Data

From: Harry Shapiro <habs@panix.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Good Guys)
Message Hash: 4a1602c7c896c541416880fe78e87350601537d6b71a002da6b6bd1aec56f237
Message ID: <199312081021.AA27536@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-08 10:23:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Dec 93 02:23:41 PST

Raw message

From: Harry Shapiro <habs@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 93 02:23:41 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Good Guys)
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: DPSWG Crypto-Policy Statement to White House (fwd)
Message-ID: <199312081021.AA27536@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


a conscious being, Jim Miller wrote:
> Why only "mass market" encryption?

> Since we target other software developers, I don't believe our product  
> qualifies as "mass market" software.  At least, this is my interpretation  
> of the definition of "as is" in the Cantwell bill:

Is there any magic to "mass market?" Like should we see, via FOIA,
if the NSA has some "secret" deals with the SPA (etc.) for "Mass
Market" products.

Is PGP "mass market?"


/hawk




Thread