1993-12-03 - This was sent to me from reliable sources but is UNAUTHENTICATED – If you don’t want to read abou it on the front page, don’t put it in writing

Header Data

From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
To: eff-talk@eff.org
Message Hash: 537addc78804c6e0a43056ab0a4a050757f3d30cb912558ca8c60d978dd9a2e1
Message ID: <199312031955.OAA16986@eff.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-03 19:59:07 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Dec 93 11:59:07 PST

Raw message

From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 93 11:59:07 PST
To: eff-talk@eff.org
Subject: This was sent to me from reliable sources but is UNAUTHENTICATED -- If you don't want to read abou it on the front page, don't put it in writing
Message-ID: <199312031955.OAA16986@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Just passing this on.  It should be of interest.  It may have shown up
here already, but for those that missed it, take a look-see.


>Here's the full text of the memo from TCI Cable COO Barry Marshall to the
>troops:
>
>As we move into the regulatory environment, it's important to remember
>something vital ... Under regulation, we can't simply adjust our economics
>anymore. We have to take the revenue from the sources that we can, when we
>can. To that end I want to remind each of you that the transaction charges for
>upgrades, downgrades, customer-caused service calls, VCR hookups, etc. are
>vital new revenue sources to us. We estimate that by charging for these
>functions we can recover almost half of what we're losing from rate
>adjustments.
>
>We have to have discipline. Much like the install fee problem, we cannot be
>dissuaded from the charges simply because customers object. It will take a
>while but they'll get used to it...they pay it to other service providers all
>the time..and it isn't free with the phone company!
>
>Please hang in on this and installs, and we can still have a great fourth
>quarter when we have out heaviest volume. The best news of all is, we can
>blame it on reregulation and the government now. Let's take advantage of it!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>My comment: there's nothing really outrageous here until you hit the last
>paragraph. They're allowed to set certain charges under the Act and FCC
>rules. Do you often not take a tax deduction you're entitled to under the IRS
>rules?
>
>But the tone anchored in the last graph is outrageous. Remember that New York
>Times rule, kids. If you don't want to read about it on the front page, don't
>put it in writing.

No guarantee is made as to the accuracy of this, of course.  If anyone has
any REAL information on where this came from originally, I'm all ears. 

-- 
Stanton  McCandlish  mech@eff.org  1:109/1103   EFF  Online  Activist & SysOp
O P E N  P L A T F O R M   C R Y P T O P O L I C Y   O N L I N E  R I G H T S
N  E  T  W  O  R  K  I  N  G      V  I  R  T  U  A  L     C  U  L  T  U  R  E
I   N   F  O :  M   E   M   B   E   R   S   H   I   P  @  E  F  F  .  O  R  G




Thread