From: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
To: banisar@washofc.cpsr.org
Message Hash: 5e3948023ed0e9eeff6d33448c3396a52ee3f6167eddca3f2ca5a9e9621f5e04
Message ID: <199312171527.KAA00286@orchard.medford.ma.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-17 15:36:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 17 Dec 93 07:36:18 PST
From: sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 93 07:36:18 PST
To: banisar@washofc.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: inman vs. crypto
Message-ID: <199312171527.KAA00286@orchard.medford.ma.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
' "My Answer", he said "would be legislation which would
make it a criminal offense to use encrypted communications to conceal
criminal activity.
This isn't so bad all by itself, but...
..you could have a registry of institutios which can
legally use cryphers. If you get somebody using one who isn't registered,
then you go after him." '
... this is absolutely unacceptable!
BTW, I just called Sen. Kennedy's office. Kennedy is on the Armed
Services committee, and according to the secretary is in favor of the
nomination, but I asked a staffer to ask Kennedy to ask Inman about
how he reconciles the First Amendment with statements he's made like
these.
- Bill
Return to December 1993
Return to “sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)”
1993-12-17 (Fri, 17 Dec 93 07:36:18 PST) - Re: inman vs. crypto - sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us (Bill Sommerfeld)