From: collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5ecc6d86705dca24bfa5ce3dd48780f3b7bae321a6d4afcde1b5f8a1da59405d
Message ID: <9312142142.AA16049@newton.apple.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-14 21:43:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 13:43:52 PST
From: collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 13:43:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Error-Qualifying Signatures
Message-ID: <9312142142.AA16049@newton.apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(Oops, forgot to include 'punks, sorry Nick)
Nick Szabo asks:
>Is a one-way hash function or digital signature possible with the
>following property: signature verification doesn't just determine
>the boolean altered vs. pristine, but also shows the picture
>distance between the altered and original?
This is possible. It is not a desirable quality for secure-hashes in most
other situations because it compromises the privacy of the original
message. Hash functions are usually designed specifically to avoid this.
Scott Collins | "Few people realize what tremendous power there
| is in one of these things." -- Willy Wonka
......................|................................................
BUSINESS. voice:408.862.0540 fax:974.6094 collins@newton.apple.com
Apple Computer, Inc. 5 Infinite Loop, MS 305-2B Cupertino, CA 95014
.......................................................................
PERSONAL. voice/fax:408.257.1746 1024:669687 catalyst@netcom.com
Return to December 1993
Return to “collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)”
1993-12-14 (Tue, 14 Dec 93 13:43:52 PST) - Re: Error-Qualifying Signatures - collins@newton.apple.com (Scott Collins)