1993-12-12 - Re: “Cipher”

Header Data

From: adam fast <adamfast@u.washington.edu>
To: Arthur Chandler <arthurc@crl.com>
Message Hash: 61a72d6e11e13bf8cd4869a7a3309db07fcaf5a1a930eafed75ff99ab250589d
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9312111732.A21634-0100000@goren1.u.washington.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.3.87.9312111505.A16266-0100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-12 01:12:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Dec 93 17:12:08 PST

Raw message

From: adam fast <adamfast@u.washington.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 93 17:12:08 PST
To: Arthur Chandler <arthurc@crl.com>
Subject: Re: "Cipher"
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9312111505.A16266-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9312111732.A21634-0100000@goren1.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> Arthur Chandler

>   Neil Postman, in his *Technopoly*, asserts that the word "cipher" derives 
> ultimately from the Hindu word for void, and therefore "suggests the idea 
> of nothingness." (p 128) Does anyone else have info on the origin of this 
> word? Is Postman correct?

the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language suggests the 
origin of the word cipher as:

[Middle English cifre, zero, from Old French, from Medieval Latin cifra, 
from Arabic sifr]

it doesn't go back further than that, but Postman's etymology seems sound...


ciao
adam






Thread