From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8d9bb66bf618dc74cc47b06f54af3b231ff4ed479a28874f5e84523ebbdeb814
Message ID: <soeLec2w165w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-16 18:36:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 16 Dec 93 10:36:00 PST
From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 93 10:36:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Keyservers and anonymous Mailings
Message-ID: <soeLec2w165w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Black Unicorn <uunet!access.digex.net!unicorn> writes:
> It seems that PGP keyservers have been attacked of late for
> alleged copyright violations. Nice tactic if you are PKP I guess.
> Has anyone considered the use of anonymous remailers to run a
> keyserver? A double blind keyserver might solve the operator a
> good deal of heat.
As far as I can tell, the copyright issue exists only in David
Sternlight's addled mind; and even he has conceded that he's got no
factual basis for asserting that PGP might infringe someone's copyright.
I can't tell if his messages about this reflect actual confusion about
the difference between patent and copyright, or if he's simply stumbled
across another FUD tactic to use against PGP.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.4
iQCVAgUBLQ7bV33YhjZY3fMNAQGG1QP/XbLehbgzvvdsSeN1YSKeKQGoZM0XigBt
0JClAQXHaoMeu2PDh4et7Txhq+IOvhAwrW3xCB+0aEXWiyZ3XGU0Z5rYL4e57/q6
Z5IgeYyPO/5DSIc+45XlwdC24X2MPENvex2IN2dYypGU4fUIff2GxaTW4hc4458u
Agno8lsCjs4=
=cjSg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Greg Broiles Lemon Detweiler Pledge?
greg@goldenbear.com You're soaking in it.
Return to December 1993
Return to “greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)”