From: smb@research.att.com
To: CRSO.Cypherpunks@canrem.com
Message Hash: 8f23cde2a53a9dfc4ecb62b1a95be41069588a2eb489bf55092d235b5eeaed53
Message ID: <9312181346.AA22687@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-18 13:46:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 Dec 93 05:46:40 PST
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 93 05:46:40 PST
To: CRSO.Cypherpunks@canrem.com
Subject: Re: Writable CD-ROMS as one-t
Message-ID: <9312181346.AA22687@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If you record - say - 5 of them and send them by 5 seperate couriers
and xor them together to send the message, your enemy has to
compromise etc 5 people.
Or your enemy has to penetrate your site or your correspondent's site,
and copy five CD-ROMs instead of one.
CD-ROMs have one advantage: there's a lot of data. But that's not
all good, because you *really* want to destroy any keying material
you've ever used.
I've heard People Who Know say that in the spook and government world,
one-time pads are falling out of favor --- because their practical
security isn't as good as a really high quality conventional cipher with
a dynamically-negotiated session key. I repeat: *practical* security;
your enemy isn't going to hit you or bribe you with a copy of Shannon's
theorems.
Return to December 1993
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1993-12-18 (Sat, 18 Dec 93 05:46:40 PST) - Re: Writable CD-ROMS as one-t - smb@research.att.com