1993-12-08 - Re: Statistics of Low-Order Bits in Images

Header Data

From: Anthony Garcia <agarcia@sugar.NeoSoft.COM>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9e78d1cc4bd9e6bf4e387792cdf3b2100cab2d4e43cf1c9221c8b874d0774440
Message ID: <199312081758.AA03226@sugar.NeoSoft.COM>
Reply To: <199311302040.AA03048@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-08 18:00:42 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Dec 93 10:00:42 PST

Raw message

From: Anthony Garcia <agarcia@sugar.NeoSoft.COM>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 93 10:00:42 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Statistics of Low-Order Bits in Images
In-Reply-To: <199311302040.AA03048@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Message-ID: <199312081758.AA03226@sugar.NeoSoft.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux) describes procedure for
preparing and sending steganographically-concealed data via Usenet:

>  4. Post to Usenet,  indicating the source of the materials (i.e. "This
>  picture came from `Girls of The Rural South, vol 1'" or "Audio sampled
>  from Michael Jackson's _Dangerous_")

Has anyone already tried looking for structure in the LSB's of the
"megabytes of copyright violations" already flowing thru
alt.binaries.pictures.* ?

-Anthony Garcia
agarcia@neosoft.com
--Why, didn't you know?  That's how the blacknet.* hierarchy gets propagated...







Thread