1993-12-05 - Remailer Traffic Augmentation

Header Data

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b9e274b7194a85aaf0d247cb437ca56385f5823b33b65a07925e277dedbddf4a
Message ID: <9312050621.AA11296@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-05 06:23:08 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Dec 93 22:23:08 PST

Raw message

From: nobody@shell.portal.com
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 93 22:23:08 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Remailer Traffic Augmentation
Message-ID: <9312050621.AA11296@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


(CAPS LOCK ALERT!!!!>

WHILE READING HAL'S REMAILER STATS I GOT SOMEWHAT DEPRESSED IT SEEMS
THAT I COULD EASILY CORRELATE HIS PEAKS WITH SOME OF MY REMAILER EXPERIMENTS.
BY CORRELATING WITH MY MAIL LOGS. I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT .forward INITIATED
SCRIPTS THAT WOULD PING EVERY KNOWN REMAILER EVERYTIME A PIECE OF REGULAR
MAIL WAS RECEIVED(NON REMAILER PING TRAFFIC).
IT APPEARS THAT PROCMAIL WOULD BE IDEAL BUT IT DOESNT SEEM TO BE UNIVERSAL
AT EVERY SITE SO I HAVE ALSO BEEN LOOKING AT C, PERL AND TCL. IF JUST A FEW 
(1-6) ACCOUNTS AT AS FEW AS 15 SITES DID THIS IT WOULD MAKE TRAFFIC
ANALYSIS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT. WHAT DO THE REST OF  THE TENTACLES THINK?


       MEDUSA'S MOTHER

     
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To find out more about the anon service, send mail to help@anon.penet.fi.
Due to the double-blind, any mail replies to this message will be anonymized,
and an anonymous id will be allocated automatically. You have been warned.
Please report any problems, inappropriate use etc. to admin@anon.penet.fi.





Thread