From: dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c1944565c5af8d6acc9f41f7190813d1a96b3d07ae500aba6f3f600f4cbc704d
Message ID: <9312032029.AA08065@disvnm2.lehman.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-03 20:32:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Dec 93 12:32:50 PST
From: dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 93 12:32:50 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: War on Keyservers
Message-ID: <9312032029.AA08065@disvnm2.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here, but why are all
these keyservers being forced to shut down? The possession of
PGP *keys* should be perfectly legal, no? Or is the logic the
same as that used to close down drug paraphernalia shops: if
people are buying bongs, they must be smoking pot, and so we
can't allow it?
And exactly what grounds does PKP have for suing? Is it because
the servers themselves are using PGP, rather than just storing
keys? What if a server is using a legal (ViaCrypt) copy of PGP?
(Problem: this argument can only be used for DOS boxes currently.)
--Dave.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.2
iQCVAgUBLP+fvsfNklulBrsJAQGTCQP8DFF77E7zpB6nOzAwcLNbEgezVjt/yQTg
DEtdmeY+hO9rcOUJoXwWMPbai2EhBHiyriAMYD5kcHrsbdiS99PW5A5kh4htaFDr
Zrrkmn7KK0LXNL0fo2aJZVLKpiy9FxcJPmQvasTqe6EVltxbi4coTNR1wUoD5FE8
0sGj9AsGr+s=
=2tQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to December 1993
Return to “dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)”
1993-12-03 (Fri, 3 Dec 93 12:32:50 PST) - War on Keyservers - dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)