1993-12-12 - Re: LPC for speech (fwd)

Header Data

From: Timothy Newsham <newsham@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu>
To: jerry@terminus.us.dell.com (Jeremy Porter)
Message Hash: d3dff31de9368625d8e802912d632bcf70a99feda7afebf367ca8cdc18ce3288
Message ID: <9312120515.AA03848@toad.com>
Reply To: <9312120409.AA10603@terminus.us.dell.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-12 05:17:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Dec 93 21:17:07 PST

Raw message

From: Timothy Newsham <newsham@wiliki.eng.hawaii.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 93 21:17:07 PST
To: jerry@terminus.us.dell.com (Jeremy Porter)
Subject: Re: LPC for speech (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <9312120409.AA10603@terminus.us.dell.com>
Message-ID: <9312120515.AA03848@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> >I'm not sure if a 486 can do the analysis in realtime.  I'm sure
       ^^^^^^^^                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^     ^^^^^^^
> >the 486 could do the analysis in real time.  I have C code for
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >LPC that will do synthesis to a file in realtime on a 486 machine.
> >(The code is mostly generic C and will compile on most machines)

> I'm not sure what you mean, it could or couldn't be done on a 486?
> I think that you meant that the compression could not be done in
> realtime but the expansion could?  Or vice versa?

Good one eh?  Sorry for the confusion.   I'm sure the 486 can do *synthesis*
in real time.  I'm not sure it can do *analysis* in real time.

> Jeremy Porter  ------------- Systems Engineering --------
> Dell Computer Corp.   ------ jerry@terminus.us.dell.com ----





Thread