From: smb@research.att.com
To: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
Message Hash: fb14db1bd52ed606671ca255b0a1714a6537b6a9c62411eb0019382299fb9534
Message ID: <9312141153.AA22625@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-12-14 11:53:52 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 03:53:52 PST
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 93 03:53:52 PST
To: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>
Subject: Re: Sun secure RPC
Message-ID: <9312141153.AA22625@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I remember a referance to Sun's secure RPC where the puplic key
was "insecure" because the it did not use a large "key" (to few bits?)
.
does anyone one have info on this?
-Pete
Yup. The modulus is too small, and the key exchange was cryptanalyze
by LaMacchia and Odlyzko. See
@article{nfscrack,
author = {Brian A. LaMacchia and Andrew M. Odlyzko},
journal = {Designs, Codes, and Cryptography},
pages = {46--62},
title = {Computation of Discrete Logarithms in Prime Fields},
volume = {1},
year = {1991},
}
Return to December 1993
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1993-12-14 (Tue, 14 Dec 93 03:53:52 PST) - Re: Sun secure RPC - smb@research.att.com