(Unknown Date) - No Subject

Header Data

From: Anonymous
To: N/A
Message Hash: 010f9e62b2f4c2b6fa44544e709e0492934d60f1f76a9493eb595d643bae074e
Message ID: <d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: (Unknown Date)
Raw Date: N/A

Raw message

From: Anonymous
Date: Tue Sep 07 12:37:43 1999
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e@NO-ID-FOUND.mhonarc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Bill Sommerfeld writes:

>For a good time, read the sections from "The Codebreakers" regarding
>what kind of lengths war-time censors went through to foil
>steganography.
>
>In this day & age, rearranging the spacing of messages "just for the
>heck of it" would be a rather obvious equivalent to what they did back
>then (BITNET does things like this today just out of sheer
>perversity).  So would scrambling the low-order bits of a sound file.

Good reminder that the opponents may try to foil (or detect) such schemes.

Fortunately, signing such messages will presumably not be illegal (we
hope!) and so alterations will show up immediately and cause howls of
protest.

-Tim May

--
Timothy C. May         | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,  
tcmay@netcom.com       | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
408-688-5409           | knowledge, reputations, information markets, 
W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA  | black markets, collapse of governments.
Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: MailSafe and PGP available.






Thread