From: Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ebd60e0640b1a87791e2aef789f12e4e591b674ea431be31cc5b96d76963eb1
Message ID: <01H8BAU8TMC896X07Q@delphi.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-31 05:52:58 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 21:52:58 PST
From: Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 21:52:58 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Requiring Digital Signatures
Message-ID: <01H8BAU8TMC896X07Q@delphi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Some have suggested that a future network might require DSS signatures
and make it illegal to send unsigned data. This would be a Bad Thing.
I found this on comp.dcom.fax. It seems that a similar law is already
in effect for fax machines. It is illegal to send a fax without an
identification line on it! This is very similar to requiring a digital
signature on a message, and sets a bad precedent.
LO> The manual to my fax software quotes the following:
LO>
LO> FCC regulation part 68, Section 68.318 (c) (3) states that it is
LO> illegal to send a fax in the U.S. which does not contain the
LO> following sender information:
LO> "...in a margin on the top or bottom of each transmitted page or
LO> on the first page of the transmission, the date and time it is
LO> sent and an identification of the business, other entity, or
LO> individual sending the message and the telephone number of the
LO> sending machine of such business, other entity or individual."
LO>
LO> (from the FaxWorks 3.0 manual, page 8, (c) SofNet, Inc.)
Return to January 1994
Return to “Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>”
1994-01-31 (Sun, 30 Jan 94 21:52:58 PST) - Requiring Digital Signatures - Mike Ingle <MIKEINGLE@delphi.com>