From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6226c19fa80db5628662eddb06e414b602b63bd51184eb4c80f75f42a170aeb6
Message ID: <9401211802.AA11623@smds.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-21 18:16:55 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 10:16:55 PST
From: fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 10:16:55 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RSA 'weak link' in PGP?
Message-ID: <9401211802.AA11623@smds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I just got (what I think is) the alt.security.pgp faq.
I quote:
...the IDEA encryption algorithm used in PGP is actually
MUCH stronger than RSA given the same key length. Even with a 1024 bit
RSA key, it is believed that IDEA encryption is still stronger, and,
since a chain is no stronger than it's weakest link, it is believed that
RSA is actually the weakest part of the RSA - IDEA approach.
Confirmation?
-fnerd
quote me
- -
cryptocosmology- sufficiently advanced communication is indistinguishable
from noise - god is in the least significant bits
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
aKxB8nktcBAeQHabQP/d7yhWgpGZBIoIqII8cY9nG55HYHgvt3niQCVAgUBLMs3K
ui6XaCZmKH68fOWYYySKAzPkXyfYKnOlzsIjp2tPEot1Q5A3/n54PBKrUDN9tHVz
3Ch466q9EKUuDulTU6OLsilzmRvQJn0EJhzd4pht6hSnC1R3seYNhUYhoJViCcCG
sRjLQs4iVVM=
=9wqs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1994
Return to “fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)”
1994-01-21 (Fri, 21 Jan 94 10:16:55 PST) - RSA ‘weak link’ in PGP? - fnerd@smds.com (FutureNerd Steve Witham)