1994-01-21 - Re: postmaster@lance.colostate.edu speaks bounce

Header Data

From: css@netcom.com (Chris Schefler)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 68203e14eaf0f8e79338e02a991d5b6ba566c132fed849d932ac93c862667d27
Message ID: <199401210949.BAA03424@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-21 09:59:34 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 01:59:34 PST

Raw message

From: css@netcom.com (Chris Schefler)
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 01:59:34 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: postmaster@lance.colostate.edu speaks bounce
Message-ID: <199401210949.BAA03424@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Forwarded message:
From owner-cypherpunks@toad.com Fri Jan 21 01:32:15 1994
Message-Id: <9401210856.AA09170@merde.dis.org>
To: Rolf Michelsen <Rolf.Michelsen@delab.sintef.no>
Cc: Cypherpunks mailing list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: postmaster@lance.colostate.edu speaks 
Phone: (510) 849-2230
Snail-Address: 2560 Bancroft way #51;Berkeley CA 94704-1700
Precedence: special-delivery
In-Reply-To: Your message of Fri, 21 Jan 1994 09:09:45 +0100.
             <Pine.3.88.9401210809.C14749-0100000@pluto.er.sintef.no> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Id: <9166.759142604.1@merde.dis.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 00:56:45 -0800
From: Peter shipley <shipley@merde.dis.org>

being postmaster on the system dis.org (where the remailer that
Detweiler used to do most of his dirty work exists)  I have recived
more then my share of complaints about reamailer.

(not that I set up the first remail on a privately owned machine, thus
risking a few grand in hardware so that I can personly garrentee that
the sysad  sendmail logs will not be released to anyone).

I am still reciving complaints from the shitmail send out from him,
now do you want to talk about noise?

>
>[flame mode on]
>
>Do you fight noise by being noisy yourself??  To me you won't be much
>better than Detweiler himself by adopting this aproach.  You have read
>postmaster's statement on the Detweiler case, and in my opinion his
>views must be respected.
>
>It is a little strange to observe a group fighting for privacy and 
>anonymity in the electronic community start whining about harassments 
>from anonymous users.  We all know that cryptography, anonymity etc are 
>two-edged swords, and we all have argued that the "good" properties more 
>than offset the "bad" ones.  Now we have tasted one of the "bad" 
>properties of anonymity on the net -- perhaps a healthy lesson.
>
>The Detweiler problem seems to be solving itself.  I haven't seen any 
>posts neither to this list or to any of "his" usenet groups lately and 
>postmaster indicates that it is Detweiler's intention to stop the 
>flooding of the net.  It is only us other users, now including myself, 
>who keep the memory of Detweiler alive.  Let's give it a break.
>
>[flame mode off]
>
>-- Rolf
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Rolf Michelsen         Phone:  +47 73 59 87 33
>SINTEF DELAB           Email:  rolf.michelsen@delab.sintef.no
>7034 Trondheim         Office: C339
>Norway
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>





Thread