From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 83bcfd4b9e0c9bd0f5fe516fe3e2ba1e4b856b2c90edc4ddfbb28ec9fa273258
Message ID: <9401312103.AA02297@toad.com>
Reply To: <9401310923.AA04199@anchor.ho.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-31 21:04:33 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 31 Jan 94 13:04:33 PST
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 94 13:04:33 PST
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Remailer Tearline Conventions
In-Reply-To: <9401310923.AA04199@anchor.ho.att.com>
Message-ID: <9401312103.AA02297@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Bill Stewart said:
> Julf's anon.penet.fi remailer cuts off anything resembling a signature,
> using the convention that a -- line (or maybe an all-dash line?)
> is a signature, since some of the common mail and news programs use that,
Picking any fixed sig marker is likely to cause problems -- notice
how often anon.penet.fi messages show up truncated due to a line of
hyphens. A more flexible possibility: allow an X-Sig-Marker: header,
which specifies a pattern/regexp to strip after. Actually, the
sig marker line itself should be stripped as well, in case it
contains identifying information.
> formal and mimeish, or a simpler '--truncate here--' sort of line
> that gets retained across remailing so additional junk doesn't accrete.
I don't see the problem you're guarding against. Could you explain?
Seems that sig elision needs to be done once, by the first hop, and
then you're home free.
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
Return to February 1994
Return to “wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)”