1994-01-28 - Re: Remailers needed. My survey.
Header Data
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 9ea7885ae881ab459f165f689072183bce0351a97435a3a85d7e63842b9c598b
Message ID: <9401280520.AA01905@toad.com>
Reply To: <199401280341.TAA00507@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-28 05:22:12 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Jan 94 21:22:12 PST
Raw message
From: Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 94 21:22:12 PST
To: cypherpunks list <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Remailers needed. My survey.
In-Reply-To: <199401280341.TAA00507@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9401280520.AA01905@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> 2 ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu <-[Way too slow.]
I just ran a few tests, bouncing umass.edu -> remailer ->
umass.edu for sizes up to 55K. Round-trip time was 3 to 4.5
minutes, uncorrelated with message size. (Bottlenecks are the
jarthur outgoing queue, and some baroque hand-off job within
umass.edu) What sort of timings were "way too slow"?
> -Xenon
Eli ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu
Thread
Return to January 1994
- Return to “Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>”
Return to “nobody@soda.berkeley.edu”
- 1994-01-28 (Thu, 27 Jan 94 19:42:13 PST) - Remailers needed. My survey. - nobody@soda.berkeley.edu
- 1994-01-28 (Thu, 27 Jan 94 21:22:12 PST) - Re: Remailers needed. My survey. - Eli Brandt <ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>