From: Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>
To: pem-dev@tis.com
Message Hash: a3bb2380c94a9f4d8ab325f8f96534f60d6829a2202f3d745a8e3cd736fe8ee7
Message ID: <199401111641.LAA14274@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-11 16:42:08 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 08:42:08 PST
From: Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 08:42:08 PST
To: pem-dev@tis.com
Subject: retraction re: triple-DES
Message-ID: <199401111641.LAA14274@ellisun.sw.stratus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Some of you may remember that I was promoting triple-DES-CBC using three
feedback loops rather than one, claiming that is was clearly at least as
secure as triple-DES with one feedback loop, while being faster for
pipelined operation. It is clearly faster in a pipeline but Eli Biham has
shown me his attack on inner-loop triple-DES and it's quite good and I was
quite wrong...at least for chosen-ciphertext attacks. The inner loops
weaken the resulting cipher drastically, under those attacks.
I might still use the inner loops to get longer brute force attacks (as
noted by Burt Kaliski in a posting here a while ago), if I knew that
chosen-ciphertext attacks couldn't happen, but my original claim is clearly
wrong and I thank Eli for pointing that out. Meanwhile, there are probably
better ways to get the longer key for avoiding brute force (eg., XOR with a
single secret value or with a simple (fast) PRNG).
I'm told that Eli has a paper in preparation explaining his attack in full
and I'm looking forward to that paper. I am sure that its location will be
announced to this list when it becomes available.
- Carl
Return to January 1994
Return to “Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>”
1994-01-11 (Tue, 11 Jan 94 08:42:08 PST) - retraction re: triple-DES - Carl Ellison <cme@sw.stratus.com>