From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b06288c341ca1853602699443a5bad08441fe44371c1440aa70932db8c5589cb
Message ID: <8Zeygc1w165w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-30 13:02:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 05:02:49 PST
From: greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 05:02:49 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: "bomb me" traffic
Message-ID: <8Zeygc1w165w@ideath.goldenbear.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm sure that the good intentions are appreciated, but I don't see how
traffic which is predictable, both in terms of size (~ 45K) and timing
(every morning at X:00 AM) is going to make the task of traffic analysis
more difficult.
Further, the characteristics which have led some remailers to be considered
unsuitable for the current project make them stronger, in terms of
resistance to traffic analysis - e.g., erratic (or slow) throughput, and
loss of "Subject:" lines.
- --
Greg Broiles "Sometimes you're the windshield,
greg@goldenbear.com sometimes you're the bug." -- Mark Knopfler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.4
iQCVAgUBLUteen3YhjZY3fMNAQHcOwP/VeWTKUZjsqKlgc/zAtTmJUnfqVWKVTfJ
Z31XiH/uZZJd3fSA85OmAV+gYZpv5Cwp+tyMppAFkNE08JykqVEbfMGVIJDAS+us
0w+gsft2WVaNabR44vgAPhJJydaYLjIgSRpFlyU/GiEqRmAo/m8sL4Rxs1qPEuiU
2a7CzBZTdmU=
=3/GR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1994
Return to “greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)”
1994-01-30 (Sun, 30 Jan 94 05:02:49 PST) - “bomb me” traffic - greg@ideath.goldenbear.com (Greg Broiles)