From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f6cc6bbaaa5dcfa42ddc472fabefc68a519f069dff0d2977c8643d17a8db6845
Message ID: <9401212005.AA10945@stygian.owlnet.rice.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-21 20:18:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 12:18:11 PST
From: Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 12:18:11 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RE: RSA is weak link
Message-ID: <9401212005.AA10945@stygian.owlnet.rice.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> ...the IDEA encryption algorithm used in PGP is actually
> MUCH stronger than RSA given the same key length. Even with a 1024 bit
> RSA key, it is believed that IDEA encryption is still stronger, and,
> since a chain is no stronger than it's weakest link, it is believed that
> RSA is actually the weakest part of the RSA - IDEA approach.
>Confirmation?
True; it is more expensive to do a brute force search over the IDEA
keyspace than it is to factor a 1024 bit number using the best known
factoring algorithm :)
I did some calculations once and I think the crossover point is
between 1500 and 1600 bits, at which point factoring becomes more
difficult than searching.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLUA1OoOA7OpLWtYzAQGjwwQAwhDqTc6TKZqEjfO1xbC1llasfVfOL3wM
72ofDeWtw7vtdxFb98iLShomdwr12G6I+7qbHwzKyLM5+r/T/DzNRAW2e+MD894Y
DNAZazRz2YLuiGpr0LBSC1S6EyFbtcuwoPh1U5LORyUrEo4YCJsYYoFfcnN+Vb8B
ddv28VkktBs=
=irY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to January 1994
Return to “Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>”
1994-01-21 (Fri, 21 Jan 94 12:18:11 PST) - RE: RSA is weak link - Karl Lui Barrus <klbarrus@owlnet.rice.edu>