1994-02-22 - RATINGS: Subject tags

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 02c5d15180a6dbebf5603d91769d3c1a4577d30782eb5cc386e0d32d13cfe870
Message ID: <9402221832.AA14910@ah.com>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9402221249.A13847-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-22 18:34:02 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 10:34:02 PST

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 10:34:02 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: RATINGS: Subject tags
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9402221249.A13847-0100000@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>
Message-ID: <9402221832.AA14910@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>Sorry for being stupid, but what exactly are these rating things supposed 
>to accomplish?  I obviously missed something.

If you read the whole list, nothing.

If you don't want to read the whole list, then the ratings are
supposed to help you decide what you want to read.  If you don't read
something, you have to rely on the opinion of someone who did read it.
The ratings list is a formal way of communicating these opinions.

Eric





Thread