1994-02-16 - AT&T stopped talking to me

Header Data

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Message Hash: 1577b11dd699b6454887d0f5280a17c5632d570eac4a35a01356b86d624efa0a
Message ID: <9402161732.AA00888@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <199402161704.JAA16456@netcom9.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 17:35:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:35:09 PST

Raw message

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:35:09 PST
To: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Subject: AT&T stopped talking to me
In-Reply-To: <199402161704.JAA16456@netcom9.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9402161732.AA00888@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



This could be a simple case of AT&T being unwilling to foster
competition against themselves.  The only way to combat something like
that would be from an anti-trust standpoint (highly unlikely here,
probably). 

Is AT&T the only company that sells such a device?

--
| GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>       |
| TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
|     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to “m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”

• Return to “rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)”

• 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:05:15 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:35:09 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
    • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:55:09 PST) - Re: AT&T stopped talking to me - “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 09:45:09 PST) - AT&T stopped talking to me - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)