1994-02-16 - Re: Detweiler remailer abuse

Header Data

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: qwerty@netcom.com (Xenon)
Message Hash: 2636b252decb3f1d1627b5540c931e8889c9e6c0a637762eac77f18cf13f0a1c
Message ID: <QhMdtqy00Vpc5JMkVy@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <199402152145.NAA06598@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 22:35:13 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 14:35:13 PST

Raw message

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 14:35:13 PST
To: qwerty@netcom.com (Xenon)
Subject: Re: Detweiler remailer abuse
In-Reply-To: <199402152145.NAA06598@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <QhMdtqy00Vpc5JMkVy@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Xenon wrote:

>Again, I wish we could get a net modeled on the postal service, in
>which there WAS NO "From: qwerty-remailer@netcom.com" in the headers.

It does work like the postal service.  You don't have to put a return
address on the letter.  You can put anything in the from line that you
want. You could put From: Anonymous Shithead and it would work.  But,
like the postal service, it will get postmarked where you mail it from,
so it will show that it came from netcom.com.





Thread