From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Message Hash: 37e78b18f00b43d3ec2fc6b4b6a4efb746346ba3f24b537aade685f799cfa828
Message ID: <199402261859.AA04437@panix.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-26 19:00:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 26 Feb 94 11:00:17 PST
From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 94 11:00:17 PST
To: CYPHERPUNKS@toad.com
Subject: I have FOIA`d the Clipper
Message-ID: <199402261859.AA04437@panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
G >There appears to be no FOIA exemption that would justify withholding
G >the key escrow databases which Treasury and NIST are building. (The
G >keys are not tied to any individual, so individual privacy isn't a
G >valid exemption. The database isn't classified. Etc.) I have asked
G >for a copy of each database, in toto.
What a great move. And I always considered FOIA requests a waste of time.
This will at least *really* amuse the recipients.
This raises a further thought though. Since it is easier to FOIA federal
records that pertain to oneself, couldn't anyone who acquires a piece of
"Clipped" telecoms equipment file a request for his *own* keys. I guess
you can capture the LEEF/LEAF in encrypted form and submit a printout of
it with your letter.
Maybe we could set up a server to help encourage people to
generate FOIA requests.
DCF
--- WinQwk 2.0b#1165
Return to February 1994
Return to “Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>”
1994-02-26 (Sat, 26 Feb 94 11:00:17 PST) - I have FOIA`d the Clipper - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>