From: wisej <wisej@acf4.NYU.EDU>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 17:21:14 PST
To: Mike Markley <mmarkley@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: fwd: Canadian gov't eavesdropping
In-Reply-To: <9402021727.AA04813@netmail2.microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9402022029.A16772-0100000@acf4.NYU.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 2 Feb 1994, Mike Markley wrote:

> | From: Eli Brandt  <netmail!ebrandt@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>

> | > HIGH-TECH SNOOP GADGET.  A super-secret branch of the Canadian Security
> | > Intelligence Service has awarded three contracts to a Montreal firm to mak
e
> | > equipment that can quickly isolate key words and phrases from millions of
> | > airborne phone, fax, radio signals and other transmissions. The hardware
> | > has the "Orwellian potential to sweep through ... and keep records of all
> | > conversations," said one CSIS critic.  (CTV National News, 01/31/94 11:00
> | > pm).
> |
> | Dunno how feasible this kind of keyword recognition presently is,
> | but here's another reason to encrypt.
>
> I'd be curious to see how they are going to do voice recognition on
> random conversations. Unless I am very sadly out of date you need to
> teach the pattern matcher individual voices.
>
You'd be surprised.  For example, Plaintalk, a system extension bundled with the
AV-series macintoshes, does voice recognition based solely on phonemes.  
Although it is not perfect yet, I can personally attest to having walked up to a
model on display in a store, tried a few simple commands by voice, and had no 
problem with recognition.  The technology _is_ there.

				Jim Wise
				wisej@acf4.nyu.edu
				jaw7254@acfcluster.nyu.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQCVAgUBLVBRwzS8O1DgkhNpAQEQcgP/cQZm7qvbwTzRrHFVO7NeGtTKCoguSqng
kH/6Mj2HOkndDydTpeZh5Zcb9JeuZHERagcD6ese71Yjihry/KTh6fNzDnYJhb/N
5vOlZZAa/8LgnLaF3IZWJJmrHqhTGlitD9AFMrFGrt420ij4GzTWsLN93Ctm7MBg
sWZvuj9JL7o=
=U/4B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----