1994-02-24 - Re: Digital Telephony Bill 1994 (Draft)

Header Data

From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
To: mnemonic@eff.org
Message Hash: 525a4120dfd696f54ec5a893d6444c50478e12913de98bf6530bff14600e360c
Message ID: <9402240134.AA00448@io.lrcs.loral.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-24 01:36:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 17:36:02 PST

Raw message

From: koontzd@lrcs.loral.com (David Koontz )
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 17:36:02 PST
To: mnemonic@eff.org
Subject: Re:  Digital Telephony Bill 1994 (Draft)
Message-ID: <9402240134.AA00448@io.lrcs.loral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>      (3) Penalties for monitoring radio communications that are not
>scrambled, encrypted, or non-public.
>      Section 2511(4)(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by
>deleting the phrase "or encrypted, then--" and inserting the following:
>          ", encrypted, or transmitted using modulation techniques whose
>essential parameters have been withheld from the public with the intention
>essential parameters have been withheld from the public with the intention
>of preserving the privacy or such communication, then--".

Is this meant to say it is okay to monitor encrypted communications?





Thread