1994-02-15 - Re: Detweiler abuse again

Header Data

From: Patrick_May@dtv.sel.sony.com (Patrick May)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6b781b3375c44d22aff745ab2eaa5eaa79a0025cf14b268034f290a881bdd010
Message ID: <9402152202.AA24363@hugehub>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-15 22:11:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 14:11:42 PST

Raw message

From: Patrick_May@dtv.sel.sony.com (Patrick May)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 14:11:42 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Detweiler abuse again
Message-ID: <9402152202.AA24363@hugehub>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Eric Hughes writes:
 > >> But an community of isolated remailers could get larger than the
 > >> cooperating set.
 > >No problem -- just add them to the killfile.  
 > A set of remailers isolated from a restriction cooperative is a fully
 > operative set of remailers.  Adding them to the killfile doesn't
 > prevent these remailers from directly posting and directly mailing.

     It would, however, prevent the cooperating remailers from being
shut down due to abusers.  Isn't that one objective?

Patrick May