1994-02-02 - Re: New Remailer Up.

Header Data

From: nobody@qwerty.org
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6c65a8d0e79c4bcae162b308728cb2b43fb26409ae3d4ea1d01abaccabd5964a
Message ID: <199402021959.LAA15215@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-02 20:01:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 12:01:00 PST

Raw message

From: nobody@qwerty.org
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 12:01:00 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: New Remailer Up.
Message-ID: <199402021959.LAA15215@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Jon wrote,
"  Aside from traffic obscuring random messages, a forced, random delay and
  a medium sized load of traffic seem to be the best ways to defeat the use
..."

How LONG should the such a random delay BE, at max? I am not willing to add
more than 10-15 minutes, max. Is this worth it then? Hours is just too
primitive when it comes to electronic communications. Even minutes!

-Xenon





Thread