From: marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 71b776264fcf84dfa591a407a3d6806c15e01bc5424cd2c9f642fee21efa48aa
Message ID: <VNogic1w165w@tanda.on.ca>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-28 16:27:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 08:27:52 PST
From: marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 08:27:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: standard for stegonography?
Message-ID: <VNogic1w165w@tanda.on.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jef Poskanzer <jef@ee.lbl.gov> writes:
> Is there a standard for stego yet? I just added stego and de-stego
Given that the whole object of steganography is to hide the
very existence of a message, wouldn't a standard be
counter-productive?
Cheers,
Marc
---
Marc Thibault | Any warming, global
Automation Architect | or otherwise, is
Oxford Mills, Ontario, Canada | welcome.
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.3a
mQA9AiyT2YcAAAEBgKVboQejsR2t2U70HoWOXTIqlWUCRGkTht8Yn/4kuzWby/e3
Z9tT8RHJbAx9us7QZwAFEbQdVGFuZGEgTWFpbCA8bWFyY0B0YW5kYS5vbi5jYT4=
=aFhG
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Return to February 1994
Return to “marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault)”
1994-02-28 (Mon, 28 Feb 94 08:27:52 PST) - standard for stegonography? - marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault)