From: qwerty-remailer@netcom.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7c69d6e304e9323d0aba8b48a478048737bcbcbd5a1d7c3384e6213e71a1b7ac
Message ID: <199402030211.SAA00952@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-03 02:11:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 18:11:14 PST
From: qwerty-remailer@netcom.com
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 94 18:11:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: New remailer up.
Message-ID: <199402030211.SAA00952@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"So meanwhile, are you giving root@netcom.com permission to try to
identify the source of your mail and win the $20 for finding out
whether you're really Xenon or you're really L.D.'s evil twin Skippy?"
I have no answer to that. I don't know what "permission" means in this
context. I never discluded Netcom employees though. I doubt they would
wish to appear to have lax security by posting the answer though.
Does L.D. have an evil twin? I hope he doesn't get a Unix account.
Seriously, your comments were the first I've seen that really explain to
me what sort of security problem a Netcom remailer faces. Now then, I
ask you as well, might you fill in a few of the blanks in the remailer
list I posted. I could send it to you if you missed it. What are the
"serious" remailers, do they keep mail logs, and are they reliable?
-Xenon
Return to February 1994
Return to “qwerty-remailer@netcom.com”
1994-02-03 (Wed, 2 Feb 94 18:11:14 PST) - Re: New remailer up. - qwerty-remailer@netcom.com