From: smb@research.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7d08de3f7381912deac6e78331e157fe1997b36ceb31d5b4289974b8d46d4a5f
Message ID: <9402282113.AA04127@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-28 21:13:55 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 13:13:55 PST
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 13:13:55 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Dorothy Denning
Message-ID: <9402282113.AA04127@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Number 2. People on this list have said that she's an expert in
cryptography. When I read that damned Newsday article posted on
cypherpunks, I thought that she was just a whiny college bitch. The
argument was just very, well, flimsy is the word I guess. I believe
that Clipper is wrong, but someone could at least write a paper that
would influence more by pointing out its merits, rather than just
saying that the government should start spying on all of us to stop
drug deals....
Anyone know:
A) Is she an expert in cryptography?
B) Is she a college graduate?
Dr. Denning is the head of the computer science department at Georgetown.
She's the author of ``Cryptography and Data Security'', a classic (though
now somewhat-dated) work in the field. In sort -- though she may be
politically naive, and she obviously puts a different weight on personal
liberty than do most of the people on this list -- she can't be accused
of technical incompetence. There is no doubt that she knows more -- and
perhaps far more -- about cryptography per se than do most of the people
on this list.
And of course, you don't want to put cryptographic details in an Op-Ed
column in a tabloid newspaper; most of the audience won't understand them.
Return to February 1994
Return to “smb@research.att.com”
1994-02-28 (Mon, 28 Feb 94 13:13:55 PST) - Re: Dorothy Denning - smb@research.att.com