From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7fafd722be61aed856b05b17dda2a2b34dc2352d5f605e431590f9b690d255d1
Message ID: <9402200031.AA09776@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-20 00:31:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Feb 94 16:31:14 PST
From: Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 94 16:31:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <9402200031.AA09776@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > set type=mx
> > hacktic.ml
^^
Perhaps this is the problem?
>
> hacktic.ml preference = 10, mail exchanger = orstom.orstom.fr
> orstom.orstom.fr inet address = 192.33.151.1
An nslookup for hacktic.nl at my site showed:
Non-authoritative answer:
hacktic.nl preference = 50, mail exchanger = xs4all.hacktic.nl
hacktic.nl preference = 100, mail exchanger = sun4nl.nl.net
Authoritative answers can be found from:
xs4all.hacktic.nl inet address = 193.78.33.42
sun4nl.nl.net inet address = 193.78.240.1
xs4some.hacktic.nl inet address = 193.78.33.33
ns.nl.net inet address = 193.78.240.1
No mention of France there at all.
> A trace route to hacktic.nl shows
> 4 San-Jose2.CA.Alter.Net (149.20.1.2) 3140 ms 290 ms 290 ms
> 5 San-Jose1.CA.ALTER.NET (137.39.44.1) 270 ms 260 ms 280 ms
> 6 San-Jose3.CA.ALTER.NET (137.39.101.97) 270 ms 2570 ms 280 ms
> 7 Falls-Church1.VA.ALTER.NET (137.39.128.6) 330 ms 360 ms 370 ms
> 8 Amsterdam.NL.EU.net (134.222.5.1) 510 ms 440 ms 450 ms
> 9 Amsterdam.NL.NL.net (134.222.24.2) 440 ms 460 ms 460 ms
> 10 annex01.NL.net (193.78.240.65) 460 ms 450 ms 530 ms
> 11 * annex.hacktic.nl (193.78.33.99) 4460 ms *
> 12 193.78.33.41 (193.78.33.41) 4980 ms 2440 ms 2390 ms
>
You'll also note no bit of France in here.
> Note also the nslookup to
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> Name: hacktic.nl
> Address: 193.78.33.42
Why is this noteworthy, other than showing the IP number?
That number resolves to xs4all.hacktic.nl.
> ********************* NOW wait just a GODAMN Minute...
> Anonymous remailer traffic for a Dutch Remailer
> is being handled in DAMN France.. where
> the Surete has a history of electronic spying... just WHAT in HELL is
> going on with the HACKTIC Remailer?????
> I DONT like the way this smells...
I wouldn't like it either, if I was correct. However, as
youv'e seen, that's simply not the case.
Return to February 1994
Return to “Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>”
1994-02-20 (Sat, 19 Feb 94 16:31:14 PST) - No Subject - Anonymous <nowhere@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>