From: Lee Tien <tien@well.sf.ca.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 81d9941ed285de75c0e18a6757eb8cad4f6bef72227de04af38461a428622f02
Message ID: <199402100241.SAA05952@well.sf.ca.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-10 03:00:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 19:00:14 PST
From: Lee Tien <tien@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 19:00:14 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Whit Diffie's comments
Message-ID: <199402100241.SAA05952@well.sf.ca.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
A few days ago John Gilmore forwarded some comments from Whit.
I was curious about one in particular, where Whit said:
"Despite all the assurances, there is another trap door in the
algorithm that will be used in reading foreign traffic. A publicly
[sic] explainable mechanism is needed if the intercepts are to be used
in court, but not if they are to be 'Handled Via COMINT Channels Only.'"
I don't understand this comment -- at least I don't think I do. Is
this a reference to some provision of federal law or a secret directive?
I dimly recall from my reading of Bamford, or some other book about
the intelligence agencies, that there's a statutory "NSA exception"
re electronic interceptions. Is that what's being referred to here?
If so, can anyone provide a citation? I'd like to take a look at it.
Lee Tien
Return to February 1994
Return to “Lee Tien <tien@well.sf.ca.us>”
1994-02-10 (Wed, 9 Feb 94 19:00:14 PST) - Whit Diffie’s comments - Lee Tien <tien@well.sf.ca.us>