1994-02-18 - Re: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money
Header Data
From: “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
To: jpp@markv.com
Message Hash: 8f25669b6325e6ebc409209304eab595cbb15be538530d5ab6269d271ec56f91
Message ID: <9402181756.AA19172@andria.lehman.com>
Reply To: <9402180909.aa02697@hermix.markv.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-18 18:01:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 10:01:09 PST
Raw message
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 10:01:09 PST
To: jpp@markv.com
Subject: Re: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money
In-Reply-To: <9402180909.aa02697@hermix.markv.com>
Message-ID: <9402181756.AA19172@andria.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
jpp@markv.com says:
> Hmm. I don't concider myself too naive about money, or digital cash,
> but I find your remarks a bit opaque. Could you elucidate please?
> Why do you insist that digital cash isn't money?
Its much more like an anonymous bank transfer. In this sense, it is
not like money just as a fedwire transaction is not money -- its a way
of moving money around, not the money itself.
Perry
Thread
Return to February 1994
- Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
- Return to “jpp@markv.com”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”
- 1994-02-17 (Thu, 17 Feb 94 12:45:27 PST) - MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
- 1994-02-18 (Fri, 18 Feb 94 09:11:10 PST) - Re: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money - jpp@markv.com
- 1994-02-18 (Fri, 18 Feb 94 10:01:09 PST) - Re: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money - “Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>
- 1994-02-18 (Fri, 18 Feb 94 09:11:10 PST) - Re: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money - jpp@markv.com