1994-02-01 - Re: Archiving mail-lists…

Header Data

From: Kirk Sheppard <kshep@netcom.com>
To: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
Message Hash: a2dba5f3472c20581b9106b7f8291f600937d9c41db7a8efb6c3af5f83e001e3
Message ID: <Pine.3.85.9402011739.A14632-0100000@netcom9>
Reply To: <Pine.3.87.9402011307.A2238-0100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-01 22:10:41 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 1 Feb 94 14:10:41 PST

Raw message

From: Kirk Sheppard <kshep@netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 94 14:10:41 PST
To: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Archiving mail-lists...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.87.9402011307.A2238-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.85.9402011739.A14632-0100000@netcom9>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


"Master" is the term one uses in place of "Mister" or "Mr." when politely 
addressing a male, under the age of majority.

Kirk Sheppard

kshep@netcom.com

P. O. Box 30911             "It is  Better to Die on Your Feet Than to 
Bethesda, MD 20824-0911      Live On Your Knees."
U.S.A.
			    			     - Emiliano Zapata


On Tue, 1 Feb 1994, Chris Knight wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 1 Feb 1994, Kirk Sheppard wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 1 Feb 1994, Chris Knight wrote:
> > 
> > <Perhaps we should try this.  You sell archives of the net, and we'll file
> > <a class action suit...  I'll back up my beliefs with actions, how about you?
> >  
> > 
> > This appears to be merely hot air, since despite all his talk Master 
> > Knight hasn't taken any "action" and it is doubtful that he has the money 
> > or other "necessities" requisite for doing so. 
> 
> And what sort of action am I supposed to take?  This was, to my knowledge a 
> discussion.  And who is this "Master Knight"?
> 
> 
> > Also, notice the term 
> > "beliefs", which explains a lot. I thought were were having a discussion 
> > on a legal or academic basis, not one involving religeous or 
> > philosophical "beliefs" or faith.
> 
> All of us, including yourself Mr. Sheppard, have been discussing 
> theoretical law and rights.  Until it is tried in court, we are all 
> stating how we BELIEVE it will go.  This has nothing to do with religion, 
> or philosophy; merely interpretation of law.
> 
> 
> -ck
> 
> 






Thread