From: “LYLE, DAVID R.” <lyled@pentagon-emh9.army.mil>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: aa74db2c2fc814e8f9236039c38d73b7167b57c6fd8977e86526b4287695ef61
Message ID: <2D6E94BC@Pentagon-EMH9.army.mil>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-25 21:14:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 25 Feb 94 13:14:09 PST
From: "LYLE, DAVID R." <lyled@pentagon-emh9.army.mil>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 94 13:14:09 PST
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: RE: Clipper Death Threat
Message-ID: <2D6E94BC@Pentagon-EMH9.army.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-->
-->On Fri, 25 Feb 1994, LYLE, DAVID R. COMPEX wrote:
-->
-->>. . .
-->>
-->> -->3. Why we have a right to strong encryption.
-->>
-->> Actually, our constitution does not say we have the right to private
-->> communication. It would be nice, but it's not a right.
-->>
-->
-->Try the 9th Amendment on for size:
-->
-->"The enumeration in the Costitution, of certain rights, shall not be
-->construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
-->
-->Privacy was a long recognized right in Anglo-American juris prudence. It
-->goes all the way back to the very English idea that "a man's home is his
-->castle."
-->
Sandy, please re-read what I said... "private communication". If this were
a right, then wiretapping AT ALL would be illegal, and it is not.
Don't get me wrong. I am all for private communications. I'm very much
against restricting the public's access to encryption technology. What gets
me is when everyone runs around saying "this is a right".
lyled@pentagon-emh9.army.mil
-->
--> S a n d y
-->
-->
-->
-->
Return to February 1994
Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”