From: jimn8@netcom.com (Jim Nitchals)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ab0c08a6533951caf3bebce767704df44354f14dd59c0a084adf16fb3c481736
Message ID: <199402202302.PAA25334@mail.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-20 23:01:26 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 20 Feb 94 15:01:26 PST
From: jimn8@netcom.com (Jim Nitchals)
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 94 15:01:26 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Key escrow for all encryption?
Message-ID: <199402202302.PAA25334@mail.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Fellow Cypherpunks,
Please gently correct my misinterpretation of the White House
press release. I read it to state that commercial encryption
must embody key escrow, even if it's not Clipper.
Does this mean we must turn over our one-time pads and our
PGP private keys to a government agency? I don't like this.
Not one bit.
Perhaps the CPSR request for votes should have read, "I oppose
key escrow," not just "I oppose Clipper."
- Jim Nitchals
Return to February 1994
Return to “jimn8@netcom.com (Jim Nitchals)”
1994-02-20 (Sun, 20 Feb 94 15:01:26 PST) - Key escrow for all encryption? - jimn8@netcom.com (Jim Nitchals)