1994-02-16 - Re: The Difficulty of Source Level Blocking

Header Data

From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: b898632c504e3e51816e6bdc10c5fdc5444d4a455621a9839ce3d1f8c592f892
Message ID: <199402162036.AA06042@misc.glarp.com>
Reply To: <199402151938.LAA13708@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 20:40:26 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 12:40:26 PST

Raw message

From: Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 94 12:40:26 PST
To: tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: The Difficulty of Source Level Blocking
In-Reply-To: <199402151938.LAA13708@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199402162036.AA06042@misc.glarp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> [Usenet] is broken in the larger sense that Eric mentioned: costs
> are not incurred by posters. This is not just a problem with
> remailers, but with the growing numbers of "Make.Money.Fast" and
> "Allah is Coming!" sorts of posts. Think about it.

Be carefull of what you wish for,  we have plenty of systems where
the costs for information are incured by the ones that produce and
diseminate it.  I for one will fight long and hard to insure that
usenet stays free and does not sink into the same myopic sluge pit
that corporate press wades through.

It's very importaint that usenet be free for anyone to post.  It's
also becoming nessesary to have good noise filters on the readers
end.


brad





Thread