From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: d03db785fc8fba5525fc5f0ca0b51f58b76c07ca09f4bb4fae24a5f1175ca835
Message ID: <9402171737.AA24752@internal.apple.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-17 17:55:24 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Feb 94 09:55:24 PST
From: lefty@apple.com (Lefty)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 94 09:55:24 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Detweiler abuse again
Message-ID: <9402171737.AA24752@internal.apple.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Jon 'iain' Boone asks:
>
> What ever happened to "I hate what you say, but I will fight to the death
> for your right to say it?"
Sigh.
Subscribing to this sentiment does not, in any way, shape or form, require
one to start handing out podia and bullhorns to anyone who has an opinion
to express.
Put it this way: I own a Macintosh, a copy of PageMaker and a laser
printer. Should I let anyone who wants to use _my_ equipment to produce a
newsletter? In particular, should I allow a person whose views I consider
to be heinous and reprehensible to use _my_ equipment to produce a
newsletter espousing those views?
To me, the obvious answer is "Of course not".
Does this mean that I'm censoring that person? Does it make me an opponent
of "free speech"? No, and no.
I will certainly defend his right to produce a newsletter. I will
certainly defend his right to buy, and use, _his_ _own_ equipment to
produce a newsletter espousing whatever opinions he likes.
People, _please_ learn what "censorship" is! If I submit a manuscript to
Addison Wesley, and they return it to me with a rejection note, _that_
_does_ _not_ _constitute_ _censorship_. I am perfectly free to submit it
to other publishers, or to publish it myself.
--
Lefty (lefty@apple.com)
C:.M:.C:., D:.O:.D:.
Return to February 1994
Return to “lefty@apple.com (Lefty)”